Restitution Law Review Volume 26: 2018

This volume is the last issue of Restitution Law Review. The title has now ceased publishing and no further volumes will be issued.

The Restitution Law Review reflects the increasing recognition and rapid development worldwide of the law of unjust enrichment and restitution. It is designed to provide a comprehensive expert information service by regional reporters from major jurisdictions in the common law and civil law worlds.

They produce annual surveys of developments within their jurisdictions accompanied by summaries of cases, legislation, law reform proposals, articles, books and other information. The annual issue includes original source material together with critical comments and articles analysing and discussing matters of practical and theoretical interest.

The Restitution Law Review Volume 26:-

Articles

• Restitutionary Relief in Competition Law Class Actions: An Evolving Landscape
  Professor Rachael Mulheron
  
• Justifying the Woolwich Principle: AN exploration of the Normative Boundaries of Unjust Enrichment and Corrective Justice
  Samuel Walpole
  

Comment

• Restitutions for Wrongs: One Step Forwards, Two Steps Back?
  (Morris-Garner v One Step)
  William Day
  

Regional Digest

• Asia Pacific; Man Yip
  
• Australia; Professor Kit Barker and Samuel Walpole
  
• Canada; Professor Mitchell McInnes
  
• England and Wales; Professor Gerard McMeel
  
• European Union; Professor Alison Jones
  
• Ireland; Dr David Capper
  
• New Zealand; Professor Peter Watts QC
  
• Scotland; Professor Robin Evans-Jones
  
• South Africa; Professor Helen Scott
  
• USA; Professor Mark Gergen

Book Review
Goff & Jones: The Law of Unjust Enrichment, 9th ed
edited by Charles Mitchell, Paul Mitchell and Stephen Watterson
Unjust Enrichemnt, 2nd ed
by James Edelman and Elsise Bant
William Day