Restitution Law Review Volume 21

The Restitution Law Review is at the forefront in providing the latest information on the subject internationally. It has regularly stimulated developments in the subject and since its first issue has regularly been cited at the highest level in courts throughout the world.

The Restitution Law Review Volume 21:-

Articles

• Rectification: Is it Broken? Common Mistake after Daventry; Sir Paul Morgan
  
• Restitution, Property, and Unjust Enrichment; Professor Peter Jaffey
  
• Failure of Basis in the Contractual Context; James Goodwin
  
• A Note on Incidental Benefit and Multi-Party Situations; Adam Kramer and Adrian Beltrami QC
  
• Peter Birks; Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Professor Andrew Burrows

Comment

• Relieving Trustees’ Mistakes (Pitt v Holt; Futter v Futter); Paul S Davies and Professor Graham Virgo
  
• Secret Profits, Opportunities, and Constructive Trusts (FHR European Ventures LLP v Mankarious); Edward Granger and James Goodwin
  
• Knowing Receipt Reasoning Imposed for a Torrens Title Regime (Arthur v A-G of the Turks and Caicos Islands); Rod Thomas
  
• The Valuation of Enrichment in the Supreme Court (Benedetti v Sawiris); Rohan Havelock

Regional Digest

• Asia Pacific; Professor T M Yeo
  
• Australia; Professor Kit Barker
  
• Canada; Professor Mitchell McInnes
  
• England and Wales; Professor Gerard McMeel
  
• European Union; Professor Alison Jones
  
• Ireland; Dr David Capper
  
• New Zealand; Professor Peter Watts
  
• Scotland; Professor Robin Evans-Jones
  
• South Africa; Dr Helen Scott
  
• USA; Professor Mark Gergen

Book Review

• A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment by Andrew Burrows; James Lee