Wildy & Sons Ltd — The World’s Legal Bookshop Search Results for isbn: '9789004715813'

Book of the Month

Munkman on Employer's Liability

Edited by: Marcus Pilgerstorfer KC

Price: £229.99

Buy

More Information

Adoption Law:
A Practical Guide 2nd ed

Welcome to Wildys

Watch

Enquiries of Local Authorities
and Water Companies:
A Practical Guide 7th ed

Keith Pugsley, Ken Miles

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Easter Closing

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17th April for the Easter Bank Holidays, re-opening at 8.30am on Tuesday 22nd April. Any orders placed during this period will be processed when we re-open.

Hide this message

U.S. Supreme Court Precedents on Arbitration: Shaping the American Arbitration Law and Practice

Edited by: Kabir Duggal, Yasmine Lahlou, Carlos Alberto Carmona, Gustavo Favero Vaughn

ISBN13: 9789004715813

Published: March 2025

Publisher: Brill Nijhoff

Country of Publication: Netherlands

Format: Hardback

Price: £135.00

Convert Currency

Buy

Low stock.

For every lawyer practicing or aspiring to practice law in the US and every student striving to become a well-rounded litigator, familiarity with relevant case law is indispensable. This axiom holds particularly true in the realm of arbitration. As the ultimate arbiter on arbitration matters in the US, the decisions of the US Supreme Court carry paramount significance. This book serves as a vital resource, offering detailed analysis of nearly 40 cases by arbitration experts well-versed in the intricacies of the US legal system. Through meticulous commentary and critique, it vividly illustrates how SCOTUS has profoundly influenced the landscape of arbitration law and practice over the years.

Subjects:: Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution

Contents:: Editors’ Note; 1. Supreme Court Case Law on Arbitration through a Restatement Lens; George A. Bermann; 2. The Evolution of Arbitration in Light of Supreme Court Decisions; Peter J. Messitte, Carlos Mário da Silva Velloso, Erico Bomfim de Carvalho and João Carlos Banhos Velloso; 3. The Importance of the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaping U.S. Arbitration Law & Practice; Daniel Schimmel, Shrutih Tewarie and James Fullmer; 4 Prima Paint Corporation v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Company (1967); R. Doak Bishop and Marcio Vasconcellos; 5. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Cas. Co. (1968): The Supreme Court’s Fractured Interpretation of “Evident Partiality” under the Federal Arbitration Act and Its Legacy; Ank Santens, Surya Gopalan and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell; 6. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. (1974); Michael B. Carlinsky and Andre Luis Monteiro; 7. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. et al., 473 US.; 614 (1985); Sherman Kahn; 8. Shearson/Am. Exp., Inc v. Mcmahon (1987); Steven Skulnik; 9. Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (1989); Peter Fox; 10. First Options of Chicago, Inc v. Kaplan, 514 U.S.; 938 (1995): To Delegate or Not to Delegate, Forty Years On; Kabir Duggal, Yasmine Lahlou, Carlos Alberto Carmona and Gustavo Favero Vaughn; 11. Vimar Seguros y Reaseguros, s.a. v. m/v Sky Reefer et al. (1995); Rodrigo Tannuri, Matheus Soubhia Sanches, Felipe Conrado and Rekha Rangachari; 12. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S.; 52 (1995); Caline Mouawad and Alex Lupsaiu; 13. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (2002); Gary L. Benton; 14. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Book (2003); Samaa Haridi and Jessica Beess und Chrostin; 15. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle (2003): The Supreme Court’s First Look at Class Action Arbitrability; Andrew Behrman, Yining Bei and Zeinab Bailoun; 16. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (2004); Preeti Bhagnani and Stephen Hogan-Mitchell; 17. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., v. Cardegna (2006); Lea Haber Kuck; 18. Hall Street Associates, l.l.c. v. Mattel, Inc. (2008): The Scope and Limits of Party Autonomy: Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards; Peter B. Rutledge; 19. Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S.; 49 (2009); Dana MacGrath; 20. Rent-A-Center West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S.; 63 (2010); Zachary Kady and Rahim Moloo; 21. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S.; 662 (2010): The Impact of the Stolt-Nielsen Decision on Class-Action Arbitration; Andrew Finn and Pedro José Izquierdo; 22. Granite Rock Co. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters (2010); Steven Skulnik; 23. at&t Mobility llc v. Concepcion, 563 U.S.; 333 (2011); Grant Hanessian; 24. Oxford Health Plans llc v. Sutter (2013); James Hosking, Gretta Walters and Marcel Engholm; 25. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant (2013); Fabiano Robalinho, Caetano Berenguer and João Lucas Bevilacqua; 26. bg Group, Plc v. Republic of Argentina, 572 U.S.; 25 (2014); Elliot Friedman and Cameron Russell; 27. Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela (2019): The Supreme Court Limits Class Arbitration; John Fellas; 28. New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira, 139 S. Ct.; 532 (2019); Michael A. Fernández; 29. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc. (2019): The Henry Schein Dispute—Uncertainty Regarding Arbitral Jurisdiction and the End of the Wholly Groundless Exception; Mark Kantor; 30. ge Energy Power Conversion France sas Corp v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, llc (2020): Application of U.S. Domestic Arbitration Law to Non-Signatory Enforcement of International Arbitration Agreements, and other Potential Impacts of Domestic Arbitration Doctrines in International Contexts; Ari D. MacKinnon, Jonathan I. Blackman and Katie L. Gonzalez; 31. zf Automotive, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, llp v. Fund for Protection of Investors’ Rights in Foreign States (2022); Flávio Luiz Yarshell and Rafael Stefanini Auilo; 32. Morgan V. Sundance, Inc. (2022); Liz Snodgrass and Laura França Pereira; 33. Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (2022); Eduardo Damião Gonçalves, Arthur Gonzalez Cronemberger Parente and Laura Lambert da Costa; 34. Coinbase v. Bielski (2023): Shift from Judicial Discretion to a Mandatory Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of an Interlocutory Appeal from the Denial of a Motion to Compel Arbitration; Boaz S. Morag and Peter E. Carzis; 35. Cmb Monaco V. Smagin (2023); Katharine Menéndez de la Cuesta and Rafael Francisco Alves; 36. Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski et al. (2024): Delegation versus Forum Selection Clause, Contradictory Contracts, and Kompetenz-Kompetenz Doctrine; Peter C. Sester; Index