We are now closed for the Christmas and New Year period, reopening on Friday 3rd January 2025. Orders placed during this time will be processed upon our return on 3rd January.
The device(s) you use to access the eBook content must be authorized with an Adobe ID before you download the product otherwise it will fail to register correctly.
For further information see https://www.wildy.com/ebook-formats
Once the order is confirmed an automated e-mail will be sent to you to allow you to download the eBook.
All eBooks are supplied firm sale and cannot be returned. If you believe there is a fault with your eBook then contact us on ebooks@wildy.com and we will help in resolving the issue. This does not affect your statutory rights.
The human rights of communities in many resource-rich, weak governance States are adversely affected not only by the acts of States and their agents, but also by powerful non-State actors including multinational enterprises and non-State armed groups operating in the extractive industry. Contemporary phenomena such as globalisation, privatisation, and the proliferation of internal armed conflict have all contributed to the increasing public influence of these entities, and the correlative decline in State power. Dominant international legal scholarship has traditionally maintained a binary distinction between ‘State’ and ‘non-State’ entities, despite the plurality of actors which fall into this latter category, and the unwillingness or incapacity of States to effectively constrain their operations.
This book responds to the persistent challenges which emanate from the regulation of particular ‘non-State actors’ operating in, or sustained by, the extractives industry in many weak governance States. It assesses the practical and theoretical impediments to the direct international legal regulation of multinational enterprises and non-State armed groups exposing the practical failings of the dominant, State-centric accountability regime. The book goes on to explore two alternative approaches the first drawing from the field of discursive democracy while the second is derived from Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. The two approaches are evaluated in terms of their practicality in regulating non-State actors as well in terms of their utility as theoretical foundations for future international practice.