Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of Borderlines in Private Law

Borderlines in Private Law

Edited by: William Day, Julius Grower
Price: £90.00

Lord Denning: Life, Law and Legacy



  


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


NEW EDITION
The Law of Rights of Light 2nd ed



 Jonathan Karas


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions

Edited by:  Bridget J. Crawford, Anthony C. Infanti

ISBN13: 9781316649596
Published: February 2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Country of Publication: USA
Format: Paperback
Price: £31.99



Despatched in 2 to 4 days.

Could a feminist perspective change the shape of tax laws? Feminist reasoning and analysis are recognized as having tremendous potential to affect employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and reproductive rights laws - but they can likewise transform tax law (as well as other statutory or code-based areas of the law). By highlighting the importance of perspective, background, and preconceptions on reading and interpreting statutes, this volume shows what a difference feminist analysis can make to statutory interpretation.

Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite tax decisions in which a feminist emphasis would have changed the outcome, the court's reasoning, or the future direction of the law. Featuring cases including medical expense deductions for fertility treatment, gender confirmation surgery, tax benefits for married individuals, the tax treatment of tribal lands, and business expense deductions, this volume opens the way for a discussion of how viewpoint is a key factor in statutory interpretation.

Subjects:
Other Jurisdictions , USA
Contents:
Part I. Introduction and Overview:
1. Introduction to the Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions Project Bridget J. Crawford and Anthony C. Infanti
2. Feminist Judging for Substantive Gender Equality in Tax Law: Changing International and Comparative Constitutional Contexts Kathleen A. Lahey

Part II. The Feminist Judgments:
3. United States v. Rickert, 188 U.S.
432 (1903) Chloe Thompson and Grant Christensen
4. Lucas v. Earl, 281 U.S.
111 (1930) Francine J. Lipman and Ann Murphy
5. Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S.
111 (1933) Nicole Appleberry and Mary Louise Fellows
6. United States v. Davis, 370 U.S.
65 (1962) Linda M. Beale and Patricia A. Cain
7. Bob Jones University v. United States, 461 U.S.
574 (1983) Elaine Waterhouse Wilson and David A. Brennen
8. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. United States, 75 F.2d 459 (2d Cir.
1985) Mildred Wigfall Robinson and Mary L. Heen
9. Estate of Clack, 106 T.C.
131 (1996) Goldburn P. Maynard Jr. and Wendy C. Gerzog
10. Cheshire v. Commissioner, 115 T.C.
183 (2000), aff'd, 282 F.3d 326 (5th Cir.
2002) Michelle L. Drumbl and Danshera Cords
11. Magdalin v. Commissioner, 96 T.C.M. (CCH) 491 (2008), aff'd, 2010-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 50,150 (1st Cir.
2009) Katherine Pratt and Jennifer Bird-Pollan
12. O'Donnabhain v. Commissioner, 134 T.C.
34 (2010), acq., 2011-47 I.R.B.
789 (Nov.
21, 2011) Nancy J. Knauer and David B. Cruz
13. United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct.
2675 (2013) Allison Anna Tait and Ruthann Robson.