Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of Borderlines in Private Law

Borderlines in Private Law

Edited by: William Day, Julius Grower
Price: £90.00

Lord Denning: Life, Law and Legacy



  


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


NEW EDITION
The Law of Rights of Light 2nd ed



 Jonathan Karas


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Neurolaw and Responsibility for Action: Concepts, Crimes, and Courts (eBook)


ISBN13: 9781108635202
Published: May 2018
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: eBook (ePub)
Price: £30.99
The amount of VAT charged may change depending on your location of use.


The sale of some eBooks are restricted to certain countries. To alert you to such restrictions, please select the country of the billing address of your credit or debit card you wish to use for payment.

Billing Country:


Sale prohibited in
Korea, [North] Democratic Peoples Republic Of

Due to publisher restrictions, international orders for ebooks may need to be confirmed by our staff during shop opening hours. Our trading hours are Monday to Friday, 8.30am to 5.00pm, London, UK time.


The device(s) you use to access the eBook content must be authorized with an Adobe ID before you download the product otherwise it will fail to register correctly.

For further information see https://www.wildy.com/ebook-formats


Once the order is confirmed an automated e-mail will be sent to you to allow you to download the eBook.

All eBooks are supplied firm sale and cannot be returned. If you believe there is a fault with your eBook then contact us on ebooks@wildy.com and we will help in resolving the issue. This does not affect your statutory rights.

This eBook is available in the following formats: ePub.

In stock.
Need help with ebook formats?




Also available as

Law regulates human behaviour, a phenomenon about which neuroscience has much to say. Neuroscience can tell us whether a defendant suffers from a brain abnormality, or injury and it can correlate these neural deficits with criminal offending.

Using fMRI and other technologies it might indicate whether a witness is telling lies or the truth. It can further propose neuro-interventions to 'change' the brains of offenders and so to reduce their propensity to offend. And, it can make suggestions about whether a defendant knows or merely suspects a prohibited state of affairs; so, drawing distinctions among the mental states that are central to legal responsibility.

Each of these matters has philosophical import; is a neurological 'deficit' inculpatory or exculpatory; what is the proper role for law if the mind is no more than the brain; is lying really a brain state and can neuroscience really 'read' the brain?

In this edited collection, leading contributors to the field provide new insights on these matters, bringing to light the great challenges that arise when disciplinary boundaries merge.

Subjects:
Criminal Law, eBooks
Contents:
Introduction

Part I. Conceptual Disputes: Brains as the Locus of Responsibility?:
1. Neuroscience and the explanation of human action Dennis Patterson
2. 'Nothing but a pack of neurons:' the moral responsibility of the human machine Michael S. Moore
3. Non-eliminative reductionism: not the theory of mind some responsibility theorists want, but the one they need Katrina Sifferd
4. Intention as non-observational knowledge: rescuing responsibility from the brain Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov
5. Efficient causation and neuroscientific explanations of criminal action Nick J. Davis

Part II. Epistemic Disputes: What does Neuroscience Tell Law about Responsibility?:
6. Lying, deception, and fMRI: a critical update Michael S. Pardo
7. Brain-based lie detection and the mereological fallacy: reasons for optimism John Danaher
8. Is brain reading mind reading? Pim Haselager and Giulio Mecacci

Part III. Implications for Courts and Defendants:
9. Unlucky, bad, and the space in between: why criminologists should think more about responsibility Peter Raynor
10. Neuroscience and the criminal jurisdiction: a new approach to reliability and admissibility in the courts of England and Wales Joanna Glynn
11. Should individuals with psychopathy be compensated for their fearlessness? (Or how neuroscience matters for equality) Marion Godman
12. The treatment of psychopathy: conceptual and ethical issues Elizabeth Shaw.