Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of English Administrative Law from 1550: Continuity and Change

English Administrative Law from 1550: Continuity and Change

Price: £140.00

Lord Denning: Life, Law and Legacy



  


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


NEW EDITION
The Law of Rights of Light 2nd ed



 Jonathan Karas


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Law and Cognitive Linguistics: A Prototype Theory Approach to Legal Categorisation


ISBN13: 9781032880976
To be Published: October 2024
Publisher: Routledge
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardback
Price: £135.00



This book advances the prototype theory of categorisation within a legal context. The work adopts a multidisciplinary approach and draws on insights from cognitive psychology, cognitive linguistics and analytic philosophy to discuss semantic problems present in law. Designed as a bridge between cognitive linguistics and legal theory, it argues that categorisation is a crucial cognitive operation for the application of law and that theories of categorisation are relevant to legal theory. It makes the case that the prototype approach is better suited than more formal approaches usually utilised in jurisprudence to explaining many familiar linguistic problems found in law, such as vagueness, polysemy, the flexibility of meaning, the generality of language, context-dependence of meaning, linguistic indeterminacy, and so on.

The book focuses on problems of semantic analysis in law, both in concrete cases, that is, particular cases before courts, and, at the theoretical level, on methods of statutory interpretation. It will be a valuable resource for academics and researchers working in the areas of Law and Language, Legal Theory, Legal Philosophy and Legal Linguistics.

Subjects:
Jurisprudence
Contents:
Introduction
1. The Prototype Theory
2. Categorisation in Law
3. Case Studies
4. Three Problems of Legal Theory
5. Conclusions