Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of The Solicitor's Handbook 2022

The Solicitor's Handbook 2022

Price: £100.00

War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation: Law and Practice

NEW EDITION


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


Wildy, Simmonds & Hill

New Edition
Small Claims Procedure in the County Court: A Practical Guide
Includes guide to Road Traffic Act Small Claims Protocol


The Complete List...


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Arlidge and Parry on Fraud 5th ed: 1st Supplement


ISBN13: 9780414069404
Published: September 2018
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Paperback
Price: Out of print




Also available as
£104.00

Providing a complete guide to the law on fraud Arlidge & Parry on Fraud sets out the basic principles and clarifies key terms. The work discusses and interprets the law offering strategic guidance to complex areas. In addition, it offers advice on presenting a fraud case, so that you can be sure you follow the correct procedures and avoid mistakes.

The first supplement to Arlidge and Parry on Fraud brings the fifth edition fully up to date with the latest developments including:

  • Criminal Finances Act 2017, sections 45 and 46 of which introduce two new corporate criminal offences where a company or partnership has failed to prevent an associated person from facilitating tax evasion in the UK or abroad vIvey v Genting Casinos dealing with the meaning of dishonesty, overruling the “Ghosh test” and applying a more objective test
  • Bitter v FCA and Hayes v FCA dealing with applications for a stay in civil proceedings where there are parallel criminal proceedings
  • R v Evans which considered new the sentencing guidelines for cases involving the unlawful distribution of infringing copyright articles
  • Hudson v CPS which addressed when an unoccupied property ceases to be a “dwelling” in relation to the offence of burglary
  • Jurecka v R on the admissibility of “working documents”