Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of Derham on the Law of Set Off

Derham on the Law of Set Off

Price: £350.00

Lord Denning: Life, Law and Legacy



  


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


NEW EDITION
The Law of Rights of Light 2nd ed



 Jonathan Karas


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Christmas and New Year Closing

We are now closed for the Christmas and New Year period, reopening on Friday 3rd January 2025. Orders placed during this time will be processed upon our return on 3rd January.

Hide this message

Law, Language and the Courtroom: Legal Linguistics and the Discourse of Judges

Edited by: tanislaw Gozdz Roszkowski, Gianluca Pontrandolfo

ISBN13: 9780367721855
Published: November 2021
Publisher: Routledge
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardbck
Price: £130.00
Paperback edition , ISBN13 9780367721886



Despatched in 7 to 9 days.

This book explores the language of judges. It is concerned with understanding how language works in judicial contexts. Using a range of disciplinary and methodological perspectives, it looks in detail at the ways in which judicial discourse is argued, constructed, interpreted and perceived. Focussing on four central themes - constructing judicial discourse and judicial identities, judicial argumentation and evaluative language, judicial interpretation and clarity in judicial discourse, the book’s ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive and in-depth overview of current critical issues of the role of language in judicial settings. Written by contributors from legal linguists, lawyers, legal scholars, legal practitioners, legal translators, and anthropologists, the work explores patterns of linguistic organization and use in judicial institutions and analyzes language as an instrument for understanding both the judicial decision-making process and its outcome.

The book will be an invaluable resource for scholars in legal linguistics and those specializing in judicial argumentation and reasoning and forensic linguists interested in the use of language in judicial settings.

Subjects:
Courts and Procedure, Judiciary
Contents:
Editors’ Introduction
Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski & Gianluca Pontrandolfo
Foreword - Dieter Stein
SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTING JUDICIAL DISCOURSE AND JUDICIAL IDENTITIES
1. The Judicial Eurolect and EU English: a genre profiling of CJEU judgments - Łucja Biel, Dariusz Koźbiał, Dariusz Müller
2. Evidentiality in US Supreme Court opinions: focus on passive structures with say and tell - Magdalena Szczyrbak
3. Standardization in judicial discourse: the case of the evolution of the French arrêts de la Cour de cassation and the use of forms in European procedural law - Margarete Flöter-Durr & Paulina Nowak-Korcz
4. The ‘consensus’ case law of the European Court of Human Rights in light of the Court’s legitimacy over time - Anne Lise Kjaer
5. Spider Woman beats Hulk: Baroness Hale and the prorogation of Parliament - Ruth Breeze
SECTION 2. JUDICIAL ARGUMENTATION AND EVALUATIVE LANGUAGE
6. Making a corpus-linguistic U-turn in multilingual adjudication - Martina Bajčić
7. Evaluative language and strategic manoeuvring in the Justification of Judicial Decisions. The case of Teleological-Evaluative Argumentation - Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
8. "… without proof of negligence or a causative connection…": On causal argumentation in Supreme Court of Ireland’s judgments on data protection - Davide Mazzi
9. A corpus-based comparative analysis of the evaluative lexicon found in judicial decisions on immigration - María José Marín Pérez
SECTION 3. JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION
10. Pedagogies of Context: Language Ideology and Expression Rights at the European Court of Human Rights - Jessica Greenberg
11. Free speech, artistic expression and blasphemy laws within the ECHR margin of appreciation - Joanna Kulesza
12. The United States Supreme Court’s Language of Racism - Kathryn Stanchi
13. Do the Words of the American Constitution Still Matter? The Question of "the Meaning of Meaning", in Current Judicial Argumentation - Anna Tomza-Tulejska & James Patrick Higgins
14. How interdisciplinarity could improve the scientific value of legal studies of international judicial decisions - Marek Jan Wasinìski
SECTION 4. CLARITY IN JUDICIAL DISCOURSE
15. Conveying the right message: principles and problems of multilingual communication at the European Court of Human Rights - James Brannan
16. Concision and Clarity in Italian Court Proceedings - Antonio Muraand Jacqueline Visconti