Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of Borderlines in Private Law

Borderlines in Private Law

Edited by: William Day, Julius Grower
Price: £90.00

Lord Denning: Life, Law and Legacy



  


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


NEW EDITION
The Law of Rights of Light 2nd ed



 Jonathan Karas


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Indigenous Legal Judgments: Bringing Indigenous Voices into Judicial Decision Making

Edited by: Nicole Watson, Heather Douglas

ISBN13: 9780367467456
Published: June 2021
Publisher: Routledge
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Paperback
Price: £39.99
Hardback edition , ISBN13 9781032004815



This is a Print On Demand Title.
The publisher will print a copy to fulfill your order. Books can take between 1 to 3 weeks. Looseleaf titles between 1 to 2 weeks.

This book is a collection of key legal decisions affecting Indigenous Australians, which have been re-imagined so as to be inclusive of Indigenous people’s stories, historical experience, perspectives and worldviews.

In this groundbreaking work, Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have collaborated to rewrite 16 key decisions. Spanning from 1889 to 2017, the judgments reflect the trajectory of Indigenous people’s engagements with Australian law. The collection includes decisions that laid the foundation for the wrongful application of terra nullius and the long disavowal of native title. Contributors have also challenged narrow judicial interpretations of native title, which have denied recognition to Indigenous people who suffered the prolonged impacts of dispossession. Exciting new voices have reclaimed Australian law to deliver justice to the Stolen Generations and to families who have experienced institutional and police racism. Contributors have shown how judicial officers can use their power to challenge systemic racism and tell the stories of Indigenous people who have been dehumanised by the criminal justice system.

The new judgments are characterised by intersectional perspectives which draw on postcolonial, critical race and whiteness theories. Several scholars have chosen to operate within the parameters of legal doctrine. Some have imagined new truth-telling forums, highlighting the strength and creative resistance of Indigenous people to oppression and exclusion. Others have rejected the possibility that the legal system, which has been integral to settler-colonialism, can ever deliver meaningful justice to Indigenous people.

Subjects:
Judiciary
Contents:
Foreword by Megan Davis
1. Introduction
Nicole Watson and Heather Douglas
Part 1: Sovereignty
Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141.
Essay: Oscar Monaghan
Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286.
Commentary: Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne
Judgment: Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne
Walker v NSW (1994) 182 CLR 45
Commentary: Tanya Mitchell and Amanda Porter
Judgment: Amanda Porter and Tanya Mitchell
Part 2: Land and Sea Country
Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451.
Commentary: Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings
Judgment: Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings
Members of the Yorta Yorta Abriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58.
Commentary: Simon Young
Judgment: Marcelle Burns
Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claims Group v Commonwealth of Australia (2013) HCA 33.
Commentary: Alison Whittaker
Judgment: Virginia Marshall
Part 3: Racism and Discrimination
Kartinyeri v Commonwealth [1998] HCA 22.
Commentary: Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee
Judgment: Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee
Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge (No.
2) [2002] NSWADTAP 6.
Commentary: Debbie Bargallie and Jennifer Nielsen
Judgment: Jennifer Nielsen and Debbie Bargallie
Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103.
Commentary: Simon Rice
Poem and Note: Alison Whittaker
Part 4: Family and Identity
Dempsey v Rigg (1914) St R Qld 245.
Commentary: Trudie Broderick
Judgment: Nicole Watson
State of South Australia v Lampard-Trevorrow [2010] SASC 56.
Commentary: Terri Libesman
Judgment: Kirsten Gray
Backford & Backford and Anor (No 2) [2017] FamCAFC 206.
Commentary: Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus
Judgment: Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus
Part 5: Criminalisation and Criminal Neglect
Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43.
Commentary: Jonathan Crowe and Dani Larkin.
Judgment: Dani Larkin and Jonathan Crowe.
Nona v Barnes [2012] QCA 346.
Commentary: Heather Douglas and Heron Loban
Judgment: Heron Loban and Heather Douglas, translation Deenorah Yellub.
Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37.
Commentary: Mary Spiers Williams
Judgment: Mary Spiers Williams
Report of the Inquest into the Death of Miss Dhu (Perth, 16 December 2016).
Commentary: Suvendrini Perera
Judgment: Hannah McGlade